In April 1954, US President Eisenhower referred to the Domino Theory to describe growing concern over communist influences in Indochina. Eisenhower argued that if the communists were not stopped, then next to fall like dominoes would be Burma, Thailand and Indonesia. With a strategic advantage communists would then be able to target Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, Australia and New Zealand.
Others rejected this theory. They argued that the Indochinese wars were specific to the particular conditions in those countries, such as growing nationalism, and had nothing to do with 'world communism'. Such critics believed that the Domino Theory was used to justify intervention policies.
New Zealand felt the impact of the Cold War and its associated armed conflicts. In the case of Korea, the New Zealand government showed its commitment to the United Nations and its notion of collective security as well as supporting the United States to contain the spread of communism. This policy was demonstrated again in the signing of security treaties such as ANZUS (1951) and the Manila Pact (1954) as New Zealand followed a policy of alliance-based security.
New Zealand Prime Ministers:
United States Presidents:
Other world leaders:
The Korean War boosted the New Zealand economy. The United States (to maintain its own strategic stockpile) purchased huge quantities of New Zealand wool (In what was the biggest wool boom in New Zealand history). Prices trebled.
Domestic affairs also saw the emergence of Cold War rhetoric and attitudes. This was no more evident than in response to the 1951 waterfront dispute. Striking unionists were labeled as communists by the government and their actions described as harming the war effort in Korea. The National government of Sidney Holland justified the use of the armed services to keep the ports of New Zealand running during this strike by linking it to the overall struggle against communism.
In 1959 civil strife in Vietnam became more widespread. New Zealand reluctantly sent combat forces to Vietnam in 1965 to preserve its alliance with the United States. Along with people in other countries - many New Zealanders - questioned the wisdom of following what was seen as interference in Vietnam's domestic affairs. The Vietnam War was New Zealand's longest and most controversial military experience of the twentieth century and the only conflict in which it did not fight alongside the United Kingdom. Protests at home raised questions about New Zealand's foreign policy: was it determined in Wellington or Washington? New Zealanders argued that the government's policy of defence via alliances was fundamentally misguided and increased the likelihood of New Zealand getting dragged into wars that some considered none of our business.
Prev page: New Zealand Forces in Asia 1948-72
Next page:New Zealand military involvement